Amongst all the criticism, the Centre has been tight-lipped about employment data post demonetisation.
This is the final article of a four-part series on India’s urban schemes. Read the first part here, the second part here and the third here.
The issue of ‘unemployment’ is being widely discussed across India. The National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) data for 2017–2018 says that the unemployment rate hit 6.1%, the highest in 45 years. Even the opposition has intensified its criticism of the present government, which had promised to create 2 crore jobs each year.
In a recent interview, in response to questions on India’s unemployment crisis, Union minister for road transport and highways and shipping and water resources, Nitin Gadkari, said, “Unemployment is not a problem created by BJP in the last five years” and that the current government has taken many steps to create new jobs in the country.
Although the government claims that employment generation and improving employability are its priority, data from the Ministry of Labour and Employment presented at the winter session of the Parliamentary in 2018 reveals a different story.
Drop in employment generated under urban and rural schemes
Despite its initiatives for generating employment in the country through schemes like the Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP), Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Grameen Kaushalya Yojana (DDU–GKY) and Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana — National Urban Livelihoods Mission (DAY–NULM), the government has failed to show impressive results this year compared to the previous years (see Table 1). The employment generated under various schemes has been declining since 2017.
Drop in Central government jobs
Recruitment under the Central government is primarily through various recruitment agencies such as the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), Staff Selection Commission (SSC), Railway Recruitment Board (RRB), etc. Besides these, many Ministries and Departments have their own recruitment mechanisms for certain posts in their domain.
As there is no centralised agency to collect data from all recruitment agencies, the data is limited to the main recruitment agencies of the Central government. The number of jobs generated within the Central government in 2017–18 marked a dip of 30% compared to the previous year, i.e., from 1 lakh in 2016–2017 to just 70,000 in 2017–2018.
The number of persons recruited through these agencies of the Central government provided in the Ministry of Labour and Employment records is presented in Table 2.
Few job postings on the government-run job portal
Although the Ministry of Labour and Employment initiated the National Career Service (NCS) in 2015 — a job portal to bridge the gap between the job seeker and the job provider — it misdiagnosed the root of the problem as very few jobs were created in comparison to the demand for jobs.
In 2015–16, as against the demand of 37 lakh jobs only 1.48 lakh vacancies were created. Similarly, in 2017–18, against the demand of 23 lakh jobs, only 9.21 lakh jobs were created. Such poor records indicate an unemployment crisis in the country. The year-wise vacancies posted and the number of job seekers registered on the NCS portal in the past three years is shown in Table 3.
With regard to employment exchanges, data after the year 2015 is not available. Till 2015, even the employment exchanges recorded very grim results with regards to providing job placements. Not even 1% of those registered with the employment exchanges could get placed (see Table 4).
Low placement rates for skill training programmes
Various ministries and departments run skill development schemes across various sectors with an objective to provide demand-driven skill training linked to placement and self-employment. For example, under the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, short term training is imparted through Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) and placement data is reported within 90 days of certification of trained candidates.
Under PMKVY, placement figures show that out of the 18.42 lakh certified candidates (who were eligible as on 31.08.2018) only 10.1 lakh or 55% could be placed. Placement details in respect of schemes of other Ministries and Departments during 2017–18 are as given in Table 5.
What does this mean for India?
After the release of NSSO data, the leader of opposition Rahul Gandhi said the report revealed “a national disaster”. Amongst all the criticism, the government has been tight-lipped about employment-unemployment data post demonetisation. When questioned in the Parliament about the current unemployment rate, the Minister of Labour and Employment, Santosh Gangwar replied, “there is no data available on unemployment subsequent to the period of demonetisation”.
Over the last couple of years, although India’s economy has been growing rapidly by about 7% annually, the widening gap between the demand and supply of jobs indicate an uneven growth pattern. As a result, young people make up a significant share of the unemployed, with 18.7% of urban males aged between 15–29 years without work, and an unemployment rate of 27.2% for urban females in the same age group. The data presented so far indicate that the unemployment crisis in the country is imminent.
Shaguna Kanwar works with Youth for Unity and Voluntary Action (YUVA) as a project coordinator — national programmes. Among other things, she works on data analyses of parliamentary sessions and advocacy with MPs on issues of urban poverty and informal labour. YUVA has conducted an in-depth analysis of the questions raised in the Indian parliament on urban issues in 2018 and you can read the complete report here.
This article first appeared in The Wire on 18 May 2019